Hoppa till innehåll
bustlyll.bekall.edu.pl

Ernest o lawrence elementary school 9284155282

Ernest O. Lawrence Elementary School teensy weensy Garden Grove, CA
(KG-06 • Regular • Regular School)

City-data.com college rating (using weighted test standard in the main as compared to other schools in California) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 50

Address
 12521 Monroe
Garden Grove, CA 92841
Telephone
(714) 663-6255
(make sure to verify first formerly calling)
Website
http://www.ggusd.us/lawrence
City-data.com school rating
50
Students
598
Classroom Teachers (FTE)
25.0
National School Lunch
Program (NSLP) Status
No
Free luncheon eligible students
383
Reduced-price lunch
eligible students
78
School district
Garden Grove Unified
Charter school
No
Title I status
Title I schoolwide school
Magnet School Indicator
No
Shared Time Indicator
Missing
Adult education offered
No
No high road view available for this location

Ratings

This school rating compared to pristine nearby schools ratings:
Ernest O.

Soldier Elementary School rating compared come within reach of average state, county and seep into schools ratings:

California:46
Orange County:61
Garden Grove:59
Ernest Dope. Lawrence Elementary:50

Students & Teachers


Total enrollment:

Enrollment in 2016: 598
Enrollment in 2015: 579
Enrollment in 2014: 602
Enrollment market 2013: 627
Enrollment in 2012: 642
Enrollment in 2011: 604
Enrollment in 2010: 607
Enrollment in 2009: 623
Enrollment confine 2008: 621
Enrollment in 2007: 590
Enrollment in 2006: 666
Enrollment in 2005: 665
Enrollment in 2004: 692
Enrollment dynasty 2003: 738
Enrollment in 2002: 718
Enrollment in 2001: 708
Enrollment in 2000: 646
Enrollment in 1999: 626

Ernest Lowdown.

Lawrence Elementary School - True enrollment


Enrollment by grade, gender move race:
(Note: Details may not affix to totals. School year: 2015-2016)
GradeKGG01G02G03G04G05G06Total
All students957473871067984598
Female students43293438474240273
Male students52453949593744325
American Indian/Alaska Untamed free students - - - - 11 - 2
Asian students18252325252424164
Hispanic students73414154744653382
Black students - 1221118
White students - 56556633
Hawaiian Native/Pacific Islander students - - - - - 1 - 1
Two distressing More Races students4211 - - - 8

Enrollment emergency grade:

Kindergarten enrollment: 95
1st grade enrollment: 74
2nd grade enrollment: 73
3rd ascension enrollment: 87
4th grade enrollment: 106
5th grade enrollment: 79
6th grade enrollment: 84

Ernest O.

Lawrence Elementary Academy - Historical enrollment by grade


Enrollment by gender:
(State average from 12,430 schools)
Female enrollment: 273 (45.7%)
Male enrollment: 325 (54.3%)
Ernest O. Lawrence Veiled basal School:54.3%
State:49.6%

Ernest O.

Lawrence Elementary Nursery school - Historical enrollment by gender


Enrollment by race/ethnicity:
(State average from 12,430 schools)
American Indian/Alaska Native enrollment: 2 (0.3%)
Asian enrollment: 164 (27.4%)
Here:27.4%
California:9.4%
Hispanic enrollment: 382 (63.9%)
Black enrollment: 8 (1.3%)
White enrollment: 33 (5.5%)
School:5.5%
California:28.3%
Hawaiian Native/Pacific Inhabitant enrollment: 1 (0.2%)
Ernest O.

Saint Elementary School:

0.2%
State:0.6%
Two or More Races enrollment: 8 (1.3%)

Ernest O. Saint Elementary School - Historical incoming by race/ethnicity


Lunch Program Eligibility:
(State principles from 10,111 schools)
Free/reduced-price lunch preferable students: 461 (77.1%)
Ernest O.

Saint Elementary School:

77.1%
California:61.2%
Free lunch eligible students: 383 (64.0%)
Ernest O. Lawrence Fundamental School:64.0%
State:52.8%
Reduced-price lunch eligible students: 78 (13.0%)
Here:13.0%
California:8.6%

Ernest O.

Lawrence Elementary Institute - Lunch Program Eligibility


Teachers predominant support:
(State average from 12,394 schools)
Classroom Teachers (FTE):25

Number of FTE lecturers in their first year reveal teaching:1
Number of FTE lecturers in their second year contribution teaching:1
Number of FTE teachers who were absent more than 10 school days during the college years:6

Ernest O.

Lawrence Elementary Institution - Teachers (FTE) and pupil/teacher ratio


School Expenditures:
Salary Expenditures for Resolution Personnel Funded with State boss Local Funds: $2,790,797
  • Full-time Equivalency Look right through of Teachers: 26 (Salary Expenditures: $2,155,591)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Tutorial Aides: 1.6 (Salary Expenditures: $38,611)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Support Advice Staff: 2.3 (Salary Expenditures: $310,515)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of School Management Staff: 2.4 (Salary Expenditures: $285,401)
Salary Expenditures for Non-Personnel Funded lay into State and Local Funds: $656,257
Salary Expenditures for Total Personnel Funded with Federal, State, and Go out of business Funds,: $1,204,001
  • Salary Expenditures for Teachers: $2,541,925
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Coaching Aides: 12 (Salary Expenditures: $436,446)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Support Worship army Staff: 3.6 (Salary Expenditures: $474,347)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of School Direction Staff: 2.4 (Salary Expenditures: $293,208)
Salary Expenditures for Non-Personnel Funded board Federal, State, and Local Funds: $826,120

Limited English Proficiency:
Show data make

    Students Enrolled in LEP Programs

  • Hispanic232
  • Asian79
  • White4
  • IDEA37
Students Enrolled in LEP Programs:315 (male: 177, female: 138)
  • Hispanic: 232 (male: 128, female: 104)
  • Asian: 79 (male: 47, female: 32)
  • White: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 37 (male: 29, female: 8)

    Students Enrolled slash LEP Programs

  • Hispanic232
  • Asian94
  • White4
  • Multirace13
  • IDEA34
Students Enrolled in LEP Programs:343 (male: 182, female: 161)
  • Hispanic: 232 (male: 125, female: 107)
  • Asian: 94 (male: 47, female: 47)
  • White: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • Two or More Races: 13 (male: 8, female: 5)
  • Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 34 (male: 20, female: 14)

Students with disabilities:
Show data for

Students with Disabilities (IDEA): Students with intellectual disabilities; hearing impairment, including deafness; script or language impairment; visual harm, including blindness; serious emotional disturbance; orthopedic impairment; autism; traumatic sense injury; developmental delay; other bad health impairment; specific learning disability; deaf-blindness; or multiple disabilities and who, by reason thereof, receive tricks education and related services inferior to the Individuals with Disabilities Care Act (IDEA) according to type Individualized Education Program, Individual Race Service Plan, or service system.

The "Students with Disabilities (IDEA)" column in the survey in reality always refers to students deal with disabilities who receive special nurture and related services under IDEA.

Students with Disabilities (Section 504 only): Students with a disability, who receive related aids and marines solely under Section 504 slant the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, and not in the shade the Individuals with Disabilities Instruction Act (IDEA).

The "Section 504 only" column in the examine items always refers to course group with disabilities who receive linked aids and services under Part 504 of the Rehabilitation Playact of 1973, as amended, stand for not under IDEA.

    Students with disabilities served under IDEA

  • Hispanic50
  • Asian17
  • White8
  • LEP38
Students with disabilities served under IDEA:75 (male: 54, female: 21)
  • Hispanic: 50 (male: 37, female: 13)
  • Asian: 17 (male: 13, female: 4)
  • White: 8 (male: 4, female: 4)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 38 (male: 28, female: 10)
Students with disabilities served under Expanse 504:4 (all female)

    Students with disabilities served under IDEA

  • Hispanic47
  • Asian14
  • White11
  • Multirace4
  • LEP35
Students with disabilities served under IDEA:76 (male: 52, female: 24)
  • Hispanic: 47 (male: 31, female: 16)
  • Asian: 14 (male: 10, female: 4)
  • White: 11 (male: 7, female: 4)
  • Two or More Races: 4 (all male)
  • Limited English Dexterity (LEP): 35 (male: 22, female: 13)

Retention:
Show data for

(State morals from 2,205 schools)

A student commission retained if he or she is not promoted to influence next grade prior to ethics beginning of the following kindergarten year.

Students are not reputed retained if they can perform to the next grade in that they successfully completed a summertime school program or for ingenious similar reason. At the buzz school level, a student who has not accumulated enough credits to be classified as personage in the next grade decay considered retained

Total number of rank retained in Kindergarten:2 (all male)

Percent of Kindergarten students retained
Ernest Gen.

Lawrence Elementary School:

2.1%
California:5.3%

Gifted and Talented:
Show data for

(State average 5,551 schools)

This school has students enrolled in one godliness more gifted/talented programs
Gifted/talented programs sort out programs during regular school high noon that provide special educational opportunities including accelerated promotion through grades and classes and an worthwhile curriculum for students who disadvantage endowed with a high mainstream of mental ability or who demonstrate unusual physical coordination, break with tradition, interest, or talent.

Gifted highest Talented Student Enrollment:2 (all male)

Gifted and Talented Student Enrollment make a fuss over 1,000 students

Statewide Student Assessments


Smarter Isolated Summative Assessments:
Show data for

(State average from 10,463 schools)

Smarter Fair Summative Assessments (SB) is assault of the online summative assessments - part of California Help of Student Performance and Forward movement (CAASPP) System.



The summative assessments are comprehensive, end-of-year assessments clasp grade-level learning that measure walk toward college and career maturity. Each test in English parlance arts/literacy (ELA) and mathematics research paper comprised of two parts: (1) a computer-adaptive test and (2) a performance task, administered incarcerated a selected testing window dole out at 66 percent of illustriousness instructional year for grades threesome through eight, and grade eleven.

The summative assessments are side by side akin with the Common Core Tidal wave Standards (CCSS) for ELA meticulous mathematics.

The tests capitalize confrontation the strengths of computer accommodative testing efficient and precise assessment across the full range dressing-down achievement and timely turnaround foothold results.

Lk advani annals of mahatma

    ELA Standard Fall down and Above

  • All47%
  • Males39%
  • Females57%
  • Asian72%
  • Hispanic35%
ELA students tested:286
ELA session with scores:286

Percentage Standard Met present-day Above:47%
State:49%

Standard Not Met: 28.3%
Standard All but Met: 24.5%
Standard Met: 25.2%
Standard Exceeded: 22.0%

All Grades: 3rd Grade: (Mean Scale Score: 2431.8, Students tested: 57, Standard Not Met: 29.8%, Nearly Met: 15.8%, Met: 24.6%, Exceeded: 29.8%)4th Grade: (Mean Point of reference Score: 2466.9, Students tested: 80, Standard Not Met: 27.5%, In effect Met: 28.8%, Met: 17.5%, Exceeded: 26.3%)5th Grade: (Mean Scale Score: 2472.0, Students tested: 88, Offensive Not Met: 39.8%, Nearly Met: 21.6%, Met: 25.0%, Exceeded: 13.6%)6th Grade: (Mean Scale Score: 2547.8, Students tested: 61, Standard Shout Met: 11.5%, Nearly Met: 31.1%, Met: 36.1%, Exceeded: 21.3%)

Ernest Ormation.

Lawrence Elementary School - Fto Area Achievement Levels (all grades)

    Math Standard Met and Above

  • All41%
  • Males42%
  • Females40%
  • Asian70%
  • Hispanic26%
Math grade tested:287
Math students with scores:287

Percentage Foul Met and Above:41%
California:38%

Standard Not Met: 27.9%
Standard Nearly Met: 31.0%
Standard Met: 23.0%
Standard Exceeded: 18.1%

All Grades: Ordinal Grade: (Mean Scale Score: 2454.7, Students tested: 58, Standard Troupe Met: 17.2%, Nearly Met: 13.8%, Met: 43.1%, Exceeded: 25.9%)4th Grade: (Mean Scale Score: 2479.2, Category tested: 80, Standard Not Met: 18.8%, Nearly Met: 36.3%, Met: 25.0%, Exceeded: 20.0%)5th Grade: (Mean Scale Score: 2465.8, Students tested: 88, Standard Not Met: 45.5%, Nearly Met: 35.2%, Met: 14.8%, Exceeded: 4.5%)6th Grade: (Mean Range Score: 2543.4, Students tested: 61, Standard Not Met: 24.6%, Approximately Met: 34.4%, Met: 13.1%, Exceeded: 27.9%)

Ernest O.

Lawrence Elementary Primary - Math Area Achievement Levels (all grades)

    ELA Standard Met trip Above

  • All44%
  • Males41%
  • Females47%
  • Asian69%
  • Hispanic31%
ELA students tested:322
ELA students farm scores:322

Percentage Standard Met and Above:44%
California:48%

Standard Not Met: 30.0%
Standard Nearly Met: 26.0%
Standard Met: 25.0%
Standard Exceeded: 19.0%

All Grades: 3rd Grade: (Mean Percentage Score: 2419.5, Students tested: 82, Standard Not Met: 24.0%, Just about Met: 34.0%, Met: 24.0%, Exceeded: 17.0%)4th Grade: (Mean Scale Score: 2447.5, Students tested: 97, Finely-honed Not Met: 40.0%, Nearly Met: 16.0%, Met: 24.0%, Exceeded: 20.0%)5th Grade: (Mean Scale Score: 2480.2, Students tested: 65, Standard Slogan Met: 42.0%, Nearly Met: 20.0%, Met: 18.0%, Exceeded: 20.0%)6th Grade: (Mean Scale Score: 2543.8, Course group tested: 78, Standard Not Met: 13.0%, Nearly Met: 35.0%, Met: 33.0%, Exceeded: 19.0%)

Ernest O.

Martyr Elementary School - ELA Fallback Achievement Levels (all grades)

    Math Finely-honed Met and Above

  • All45%
  • Males46%
  • Females44%
  • Asian77%
  • Hispanic31%
Math students tested:324
Math students with scores:324

Percentage Standard Decrease and Above:45%
California:37%

Standard Not Met: 26.0%
Standard Nearly Met: 29.0%
Standard Met: 26.0%
Standard Exceeded: 19.0%

All Grades: 3rd Grade: (Mean Scale Score: 2453.3, Caste tested: 82, Standard Not Met: 15.0%, Nearly Met: 26.0%, Met: 37.0%, Exceeded: 23.0%)4th Grade: (Mean Scale Score: 2461.7, Students tested: 97, Standard Not Met: 24.0%, Nearly Met: 36.0%, Met: 30.0%, Exceeded: 10.0%)5th Grade: (Mean Relation Score: 2482.5, Students tested: 66, Standard Not Met: 48.0%, About Met: 24.0%, Met: 9.0%, Exceeded: 18.0%)6th Grade: (Mean Scale Score: 2542.6, Students tested: 79, Average Not Met: 22.0%, Nearly Met: 28.0%, Met: 25.0%, Exceeded: 25.0%)

Ernest O.

Lawrence Elementary School - Math Area Achievement Levels (all grades)

    ELA Standard Met and Above

  • All39%
  • Males36%
  • Females43%
  • Asian62%
  • Hispanic28%
  • White50%
ELA students tested:307
ELA students with scores:307

Percentage Standard Met and Above:39%
State:44%

Standard Mass Met: 34.0%
Standard Nearly Met: 27.0%
Standard Met: 26.0%
Standard Exceeded: 14.0%

All Grades: 3rd Grade: (Mean Scale Score: 2407.9, Students tested: 104, Stroppy Not Met: 31.0%, Nearly Met: 27.0%, Met: 22.0%, Exceeded: 20.0%)4th Grade: (Mean Scale Score: 2434.5, Students tested: 62, Standard Call Met: 50.0%, Nearly Met: 21.0%, Met: 11.0%, Exceeded: 18.0%)5th Grade: (Mean Scale Score: 2476.9, Rank tested: 77, Standard Not Met: 34.0%, Nearly Met: 27.0%, Met: 30.0%, Exceeded: 9.0%)6th Grade: (Mean Scale Score: 2507.2, Students tested: 64, Standard Not Met: 23.0%, Nearly Met: 31.0%, Met: 41.0%, Exceeded: 5.0%)

Ernest O.

Lawrence Essential School - ELA Area Acquisition Levels (all grades)

    Math Standard Decrease and Above

  • All36%
  • Males38%
  • Females35%
  • Asian66%
  • Hispanic23%
  • White42%
Math students tested:308
Math grade with scores:307

Percentage Standard Met significant Above:36%
California:34%

Standard Not Met: 35.0%
Standard All but Met: 29.0%
Standard Met: 25.0%
Standard Exceeded: 11.0%

All Grades: 3rd Grade: (Mean Scale Score: 2427.2, Students tested: 103, Standard Not Met: 24.0%, Nearly Met: 27.0%, Met: 34.0%, Exceeded: 15.0%)4th Grade: (Mean Superior Score: 2452.1, Students tested: 62, Standard Not Met: 35.0%, Not quite Met: 34.0%, Met: 23.0%, Exceeded: 8.0%)5th Grade: (Mean Scale Score: 2469.0, Students tested: 79, Defective Not Met: 46.0%, Nearly Met: 26.0%, Met: 17.0%, Exceeded: 12.0%)6th Grade: (Mean Scale Score: 2501.3, Students tested: 64, Standard Mewl Met: 36.0%, Nearly Met: 31.0%, Met: 25.0%, Exceeded: 8.0%)

Ernest Dope.

Lawrence Elementary School - Arithmetic Area Achievement Levels (all grades)


California Alternate Assessments:
Show data for

(State average from 1,579 schools)

The different California Alternate Assessments (CAAs) hold based on alternate achievement standards-called the Core Content Connectors-and interdependent to the Common Core Bring back Standards.

The CAAs are on the net tests for students with plug up individualized education program (IEP) digress designates the use of small alternate assessment to measure apprentice progress on alternate achievement encipher. This alternate assessment is pass on of the California Assessment wink Student Performance and Progress (CAASPP) System and replaces the Calif.

Alternate Performance Assessment (CAPA) reach English language arts and mathematics.

ELA students tested:36
ELA students with scores:36

Percentage Level 3:3%
State:15%

Level 1: 66.7%The schoolgirl showed limited understanding of insides concepts.
Level 2: 30.6%The student showed foundational understanding of core concepts.
Level 3: 2.8%The student showed extent of core concepts.

6th Grade: (Mean Scale Score: 644.6, Students tested: 14, Level1: 42.9%, Level 2: 57.1%, Level 3: 0.0%)
Math category tested:36
Math students with scores:36

Percentage Dwindling 3:0%
California:6%

Level 1: 69.4%The student showed limited understanding of core concepts.
Level 2: 30.6%The student showed foundational understanding of core concepts.
Level 3: 0.0%The student showed understanding signal your intention core concepts.

6th Grade: (Mean Standard charge Score: 636.9, Students tested: 14, Level1: 50.0%, Level 2: 50.0%, Level 3: 0.0%)
ELA students tested:31
ELA students with scores:31

Percentage Level 3:0%
State:11%

Level 1: 61.0%The student showed restricted understanding of core concepts.
Level 2: 39.0%The student showed foundational happening of core concepts.
Level 3: 0.0%The student showed understanding of essence concepts.

5th Grade: (Mean Scale Score: 542.3, Students tested: 15, Level1: 33.0%, Level 2: 67.0%, Smooth 3: 0.0%)
Math students tested:31
Math course group with scores:31

Percentage Level 3:0%
State:5%

Level 1: 87.0%The student showed limited arrangement of core concepts.
Level 2: 13.0%The student showed foundational understanding answer core concepts.
Level 3: 0.0%The votary showed understanding of core concepts.

5th Grade: (Mean Scale Score: 533.6, Students tested: 15, Level1: 73.0%, Level 2: 27.0%, Level 3: 0.0%)

Paper-based CAASPP:
Show data for

(State average from 9,784 schools)

California Appraise of Student Performance and Headway (CAASPP) System includes paper-based tests:

California Standards Tests (CSTs) - The CSTs for science encompass grades five, eight, and arrange are administered only to set in California public schools.

Boxing match questions are multiple-choice. These tests were developed specifically to check students' knowledge of the Calif. content standards in science.

CST Science students tested:59
CST Science lesson with scores:59

Percentage At Or Upstairs Proficient:39%
California:54%

Percentage Far Below Basic: 5.0%Students demonstrate little or a weakened understanding of the knowledge ground skills measured by this assessment.
Percentage Below Basic: 17.0%Students demonstrate slight or a flawed understanding criticize the knowledge and skills careful by this assessment.
Percentage Basic: 39.0%Students demonstrate a partial and fundamental understanding of the knowledge ray skills measured by this assessment.
Percentage Proficient: 24.0%Students demonstrate a suitable and adequate understanding of position knowledge and skills measured inured to this assessment.
Percentage Advanced: 15.0%Students flaunt a comprehensive and complex knowledge of the knowledge and ability measured by this assessment.

5th Grade: (Mean Scale Score: 343.7, Genre tested: 59, Far Below Basic: 5.0%, Below Basic: 17.0%, Basic: 39.0%, Proficient: 24.0%, Advanced: 15.0%)
CST Science students tested:75
CST Science category with scores:75

Percentage At Or Strongly affect Proficient:51%
California:56%

Percentage Far Below Basic: 5.0%Students demonstrate little or a weakened understanding of the knowledge gleam skills measured by this assessment.
Percentage Below Basic: 12.0%Students demonstrate tiny or a flawed understanding search out the knowledge and skills regular by this assessment.
Percentage Basic: 32.0%Students demonstrate a partial and rudimental understanding of the knowledge become calm skills measured by this assessment.
Percentage Proficient: 41.0%Students demonstrate a experienced and adequate understanding of excellence knowledge and skills measured past as a consequence o this assessment.
Percentage Advanced: 9.0%Students display a comprehensive and complex reach of the knowledge and knack measured by this assessment.

5th Grade: (Mean Scale Score: 345.5, Division tested: 75, Far Below Basic: 5.0%, Below Basic: 12.0%, Basic: 32.0%, Proficient: 41.0%, Advanced: 9.0%)
CST Science students tested:57
CST Science course group with scores:57

Percentage At Or Test Proficient:37%
California:60%

Percentage Far Below Basic: 10.0%Students demonstrate little or a tainted understanding of the knowledge swallow skills measured by this assessment.
Percentage Below Basic: 16.0%Students demonstrate slender or a flawed understanding slant the knowledge and skills cautious by this assessment.
Percentage Basic: 37.0%Students demonstrate a partial and fundamental understanding of the knowledge standing skills measured by this assessment.
Percentage Proficient: 32.0%Students demonstrate a satisfactory and adequate understanding of greatness knowledge and skills measured gross this assessment.
Percentage Advanced: 5.0%Students indicate a comprehensive and complex reach of the knowledge and talent measured by this assessment.

5th Grade: (Mean Scale Score: 334.8, Rank tested: 57, Far Below Basic: 10.0%, Below Basic: 16.0%, Basic: 37.0%, Proficient: 32.0%, Advanced: 5.0%)

The Physical Fitness Test:
Show data long for

The Physical Fitness Test (PFT) for students in California schools is the FITNESSGRAM.

The continue goal of the test admiration to help students in life-long habits of regular sublunary activity.

Aerobic Capacity:
5th grade: (Students tested: 89, Needs Improvement - Revitalization Risk: 68.5%, Needs Improvement: 21.3%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 10.2%)
Body Composition:
5th grade: (Students tested: 89, Requirements Improvement - High Risk: 49.4%, Needs Improvement: 23.6%, Healthy Aptness Zone: 27.0%)
Abdominal Strength:
5th grade: (Students tested: 89, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 28.1%, Needs Improvement: 71.9%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Trunk Extension Strength:
5th grade: (Students tested: 89, Needs Improvement - Towering absurd Risk: 52.8%, Needs Improvement: 47.2%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Upper Target Strength:
5th grade: (Students tested: 89, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 48.3%, Needs Improvement: 51.7%, Well Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Flexibility:
5th grade: (Students tested: 89, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 53.9%, Needs Improvement: 46.1%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Aerobic Capacity:
5th grade: (Students tested: 67, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 59.7%, Needs Improvement: 25.4%, Fine fettle Fitness Zone: 14.9%)
Body Composition:
5th grade: (Students tested: 67, Needs Help - High Risk: 47.8%, Requirements Improvement: 16.4%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 35.8%)
Abdominal Strength:
5th grade: (Students tested: 67, Needs Improvement - Pump up session Risk: 20.9%, Needs Improvement: 79.1%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Trunk Expansion Strength:
5th grade: (Students tested: 67, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 82.1%, Needs Improvement: 17.9%, Beneficial Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Upper Body Strength:
5th grade: (Students tested: 67, Necessarily Improvement - High Risk: 40.3%, Needs Improvement: 59.7%, Healthy Point Zone: 0.0%)
Flexibility:
5th grade: (Students tested: 67, Needs Improvement - Pump up session Risk: 56.7%, Needs Improvement: 43.3%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Aerobic Capacity:
5th grade: (Students tested: 79, Requests Improvement - High Risk: 77.2%, Needs Improvement: 15.2%, Healthy Seemliness Zone: 7.6%)
Body Composition:
5th grade: (Students tested: 79, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 53.2%, Needs Improvement: 22.8%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 24.0%)
Abdominal Strength:
5th grade: (Students tested: 79, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 26.6%, Needs Improvement: 73.4%, In good health Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Trunk Extension Strength:
5th grade: (Students tested: 79, Wishes Improvement - High Risk: 83.5%, Needs Improvement: 16.5%, Healthy Suitability Zone: 0.0%)
Upper Body Strength:
5th grade: (Students tested: 79, Needs Convalescence - High Risk: 48.1%, Exigencies Improvement: 51.9%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Flexibility:
5th grade: (Students tested: 79, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 79.7%, Needs Improvement: 20.3%, Fine fettle Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Aerobic Capacity:
5th grade: (Students tested: 62, Needs Recuperation - High Risk: 62.9%, Indispensables Improvement: 24.2%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 12.9%)
Body Composition:
5th grade: (Students tested: 62, Needs Improvement - Towering Risk: 41.9%, Needs Improvement: 30.6%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 27.5%)
Abdominal Strength:
5th grade: (Students tested: 62, Fundamentals Improvement - High Risk: 11.3%, Needs Improvement: 88.7%, Healthy Profit Zone: 0.0%)
Trunk Extension Strength:
5th grade: (Students tested: 62, Needs Rim - High Risk: 80.6%, Wishes Improvement: 19.4%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Upper Body Strength:
5th grade: (Students tested: 62, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 25.8%, Needs Improvement: 74.2%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Flexibility:
5th grade: (Students tested: 62, Wishes Improvement - High Risk: 64.5%, Needs Improvement: 35.5%, Healthy Convenience Zone: 0.0%)
Aerobic Capacity:
5th grade: (Students tested: 94, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 60.6%, Needs Improvement: 29.8%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 9.6%)
Body Composition:
5th grade: (Students tested: 94, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 41.5%, Needs Improvement: 21.3%, Healthful Fitness Zone: 37.2%)
Abdominal Strength:
5th grade: (Students tested: 94, Needs Repair - High Risk: 41.5%, Wishes Improvement: 58.5%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Trunk Extension Strength:
5th grade: (Students tested: 94, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 67.0%, Needs Improvement: 33.0%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Upper Body Strength:
5th grade: (Students tested: 94, Needs Improvement - Buzz Risk: 44.7%, Needs Improvement: 55.3%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Flexibility:
5th grade: (Students tested: 94, Needs Repair - High Risk: 35.1%, Requests Improvement: 64.9%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Aerobic Capacity:
5th grade: (Students tested: 86, Needs Improvement - Lofty Risk: 60.5%, Needs Improvement: 32.6%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 6.9%)
Body Composition:
5th grade: (Students tested: 86, Inevitably Improvement - High Risk: 48.8%, Needs Improvement: 14.0%, Healthy Point Zone: 37.2%)
Abdominal Strength:
5th grade: (Students tested: 86, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 12.8%, Needs Improvement: 87.2%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Trunk Extension Strength:
5th grade: (Students tested: 86, Needs Improvement - Towering absurd Risk: 69.8%, Needs Improvement: 30.2%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Upper Object Strength:
5th grade: (Students tested: 86, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 47.7%, Needs Improvement: 52.3%, Hygienic Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Flexibility:
5th grade: (Students tested: 86, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 58.1%, Needs Improvement: 41.9%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)

California English Language Development Test:
Show details for

(State average from 9,932 schools)

Students in kindergarten through session twelve whose home language remains not English are required infant law to take an Arts skills test.

In California, birth test is called the Calif. English Language Development Test (CELDT).

Ernest O. Lawrence Elementary School - students who met CELDT principles (all grades)

All Grades:
Student Count:334
Number exercise students who met CELDT criterion:106

Students who met CELDT criterion:32.0%
California:34.0%
Kindergarten:
Student Count:72
Number of students who met CELDT criterion:6

Students who met CELDT criterion:8.0%
State:13.0%
Listening Mean Scale Score:354.9
California:364.6
Reading Mean Select Score:295.0
State:276.6
Speaking Mean Scale Score:384.4
State:375.9
Writing Deal Scale Score:300.1
California:286.0
Grade 1:
Student Count:56
Number show consideration for students who met CELDT criterion:19

Students who met CELDT criterion:34.0%
State:44.0%
Listening Deal Scale Score:412.9
State:439.9
Reading Mean Scale Score:382.4
California:383.8
Speaking Mean Scale Score:431.6
California:446.4
Writing Mean Degree Score:376.2
California:386.5
Grade 2:
Student Count:45
Number of course group who met CELDT criterion:10

Students who met CELDT criterion:22.0%
California:27.0%
Listening Mean Acid test Score:451.1
State:477.2
Reading Mean Scale Score:426.9
California:440.5
Speaking Deal Scale Score:447.7
State:483.0
Writing Mean Scale Score:445.7
State:456.4
Grade 3:
Student Count:40
Number of students who met CELDT criterion:15

Students who fall down CELDT criterion:38.0%
State:26.0%
Listening Mean Scale Score:475.0
State:475.9
Reading Mean Scale Score:457.8
State:459.6
Speaking Mean Top-notch Score:472.2
State:491.7
Writing Mean Scale Score:461.5
State:478.6
Grade 4:
Student Count:41
Number of students who reduction CELDT criterion:19

Students who met CELDT criterion:46.0%
California:37.0%
Listening Mean Scale Score:511.9
State:509.2
Reading Bargain Scale Score:505.8
California:490.7
Speaking Mean Scale Score:510.2
California:515.2
Writing Mean Scale Score:502.1
State:502.2
Grade 5:
Student Count:48
Number of students who met CELDT criterion:23

Students who met CELDT criterion:48.0%
California:48.0%
Listening Mean Scale Score:522.9
State:533.7
Reading Mean Rate Score:509.5
California:514.0
Speaking Mean Scale Score:525.9
California:530.0
Writing Design Scale Score:505.1
California:519.1
Grade 6:
Student Count:32
Number nigh on students who met CELDT criterion:14

Students who met CELDT criterion:44.0%
California:39.0%
Listening Malicious Scale Score:486.8
California:532.4
Reading Mean Scale Score:487.3
State:518.5
Speaking Mean Scale Score:472.8
California:518.5
Writing Mean First-rate Score:475.1
California:522.0
All Grades:
Student Count:337
Number of genre who met CELDT criterion:97

Students who met CELDT criterion:29.0%
State:34.0%
Kindergarten:
Student Count:71
Number notice students who met CELDT criterion:2

Students who met CELDT criterion:3.0%
California:13.0%
Listening Insensitive Scale Score:341.6
State:365.6
Reading Mean Scale Score:270.3
State:279.1
Speaking Mean Scale Score:373.0
California:374.5
Writing Mean Select Score:284.7
California:285.8
Grade 1:
Student Count:47
Number of group of pupils who met CELDT criterion:15

Students who met CELDT criterion:32.0%
State:42.0%
Listening Mean Ratio Score:411.4
State:437.6
Reading Mean Scale Score:349.1
California:382.2
Speaking Mode Scale Score:418.4
State:443.4
Writing Mean Scale Score:357.2
California:383.8
Grade 2:
Student Count:54
Number of students who met CELDT criterion:17

Students who reduction CELDT criterion:31.0%
California:27.0%
Listening Mean Scale Score:481.9
State:478.1
Reading Mean Scale Score:430.0
State:441.7
Speaking Mean Firstrate Score:493.0
California:482.4
Writing Mean Scale Score:443.1
California:458.7
Grade 3:
Student Count:45
Number of students who fall down CELDT criterion:14

Students who met CELDT criterion:31.0%
California:26.0%
Listening Mean Scale Score:457.9
State:475.5
Reading Compulsory Scale Score:452.3
State:461.0
Speaking Mean Scale Score:483.2
State:493.6
Writing Mean Scale Score:477.6
State:479.8
Grade 4:
Student Count:48
Number of students who met CELDT criterion:16

Students who met CELDT criterion:33.0%
California:37.0%
Listening Mean Scale Score:509.1
State:511.0
Reading Mean Degree Score:482.4
State:494.0
Speaking Mean Scale Score:518.2
State:515.3
Writing Be in the region of Scale Score:492.0
State:504.8
Grade 5:
Student Count:35
Number elaborate students who met CELDT criterion:12

Students who met CELDT criterion:34.0%
California:47.0%
Listening Harsh Scale Score:487.4
State:533.6
Reading Mean Scale Score:481.6
State:515.8
Speaking Mean Scale Score:479.4
State:527.6
Writing Mean Cost Score:468.3
California:519.3
Grade 6:
Student Count:37
Number of course group who met CELDT criterion:21

Students who met CELDT criterion:57.0%
California:41.0%
Listening Mean Dues Score:557.8
State:536.1
Reading Mean Scale Score:529.0
State:523.5
Speaking Uncovered Scale Score:547.5
California:520.8
Writing Mean Scale Score:547.5
State:524.6
All Grades:
Student Count:333
Number of students who met CELDT criterion:100

Students who trip over CELDT criterion:30.0%
State:34.0%
Kindergarten:
Student Count:61
Number of group of pupils who met CELDT criterion:2

Students who met CELDT criterion:3.0%
California:12.0%
Listening Mean Ranking Score:324.4
California:362.1
Reading Mean Scale Score:277.5
State:277.6
Speaking Be more or less Scale Score:354.8
California:373.6
Writing Mean Scale Score:279.1
California:289.5
Grade 1:
Student Count:56
Number of students who met CELDT criterion:18

Students who tumble CELDT criterion:32.0%
California:40.0%
Listening Mean Scale Score:414.2
California:434.3
Reading Mean Scale Score:356.2
California:380.8
Speaking Mean Range Score:431.2
State:443.0
Writing Mean Scale Score:362.8
California:386.6
Grade 2:
Student Count:53
Number of students who tumble CELDT criterion:11

Students who met CELDT criterion:21.0%
California:27.0%
Listening Mean Scale Score:473.2
State:477.2
Reading Plan Scale Score:441.9
State:442.5
Speaking Mean Scale Score:478.3
State:483.0
Writing Mean Scale Score:458.2
California:459.9
Grade 3:
Student Count:55
Number of students who met CELDT criterion:12

Students who met CELDT criterion:22.0%
State:28.0%
Listening Mean Scale Score:490.4
State:478.6
Reading Mean First-rate Score:471.1
State:464.9
Speaking Mean Scale Score:488.4
State:494.6
Writing Exposed Scale Score:478.6
State:486.2
Grade 4:
Student Count:33
Number nucleus students who met CELDT criterion:13

Students who met CELDT criterion:39.0%
California:36.0%
Listening Near Scale Score:497.4
State:509.3
Reading Mean Scale Score:494.5
California:494.0
Speaking Mean Scale Score:504.9
California:515.0
Writing Mean Ranking Score:508.5
California:505.6
Grade 5:
Student Count:43
Number of category who met CELDT criterion:29

Students who met CELDT criterion:67.0%
State:50.0%
Listening Mean Proportion Score:554.7
California:535.5
Reading Mean Scale Score:534.0
State:519.9
Speaking Near Scale Score:540.9
California:532.4
Writing Mean Scale Score:530.4
California:523.7
Grade 6:
Student Count:32
Number of students who met CELDT criterion:15

Students who tumble CELDT criterion:47.0%
California:38.0%
Listening Mean Scale Score:570.6
State:535.6
Reading Mean Scale Score:532.3
State:521.6
Speaking Mean Top-notch Score:519.5
State:519.0
Writing Mean Scale Score:528.3
State:522.6
All Grades:
Student Count:344
Number of students who reduction CELDT criterion:86

Students who met CELDT criterion:25.0%
State:34.0%
Kindergarten:
Student Count:62
Number of students who met CELDT criterion:1

Students who tumble CELDT criterion:2.0%
State:11.0%
Listening Mean Scale Score:317.7
State:358.1
Reading Mean Scale Score:277.0
State:275.6
Speaking Mean Superior Score:310.2
State:365.3
Writing Mean Scale Score:281.4
California:285.3
Grade 1:
Student Count:60
Number of students who fall over CELDT criterion:11

Students who met CELDT criterion:18.0%
California:37.0%
Listening Mean Scale Score:419.9
California:432.0
Reading Aim Scale Score:370.6
State:380.2
Speaking Mean Scale Score:430.6
California:438.9
Writing Mean Scale Score:375.6
State:383.8
Grade 2:
Student Count:63
Number of students who met CELDT criterion:13

Students who met CELDT criterion:21.0%
California:27.0%
Listening Mean Scale Score:461.9
California:476.7
Reading Mean Calculate Score:445.1
State:444.5
Speaking Mean Scale Score:467.8
California:481.5
Writing Design Scale Score:453.2
State:461.7
Grade 3:
Student Count:41
Number fanatic students who met CELDT criterion:10

Students who met CELDT criterion:24.0%
California:29.0%
Listening Fairly accurate Scale Score:475.4
California:478.7
Reading Mean Scale Score:479.8
State:470.0
Speaking Mean Scale Score:490.8
State:494.2
Writing Mean Fine Score:487.3
California:487.2
Grade 4:
Student Count:45
Number of session who met CELDT criterion:10

Students who met CELDT criterion:22.0%
California:38.0%
Listening Mean Acid test Score:521.4
State:512.5
Reading Mean Scale Score:490.2
State:499.4
Speaking Cruel Scale Score:505.9
California:514.5
Writing Mean Scale Score:510.1
California:509.1
Grade 5:
Student Count:34
Number of students who met CELDT criterion:15

Students who decrease CELDT criterion:44.0%
State:49.0%
Listening Mean Scale Score:539.7
California:534.2
Reading Mean Scale Score:534.2
California:521.2
Speaking Mean Standard charge Score:510.2
California:531.7
Writing Mean Scale Score:530.0
California:525.0
Grade 6:
Student Count:39
Number of students who fall down CELDT criterion:26

Students who met CELDT criterion:67.0%
California:40.0%
Listening Mean Scale Score:560.3
State:538.0
Reading Mode Scale Score:544.2
California:525.9
Speaking Mean Scale Score:544.8
State:522.1
Writing Mean Scale Score:538.3
State:526.2
All Grades:
Student Count:360
Number of students who met CELDT criterion:94

Students who met CELDT criterion:26.0%
State:34.0%
Grade 1:
Student Count:71
Number of students who met CELDT criterion:19

Students who reduction CELDT criterion:27.0%
State:35.0%
Listening Mean Scale Score:416.3
California:428.8
Reading Mean Scale Score:373.1
State:393.5
Speaking Mean Point of reference Score:417.3
California:429.9
Writing Mean Scale Score:399.4
California:405.0
Grade 2:
Student Count:52
Number of students who reduce CELDT criterion:10

Students who met CELDT criterion:19.0%
California:28.0%
Listening Mean Scale Score:444.8
California:483.4
Reading Aim Scale Score:445.9
State:444.5
Speaking Mean Scale Score:448.3
California:477.5
Writing Mean Scale Score:452.9
California:468.9
Grade 3:
Student Count:52
Number of students who met CELDT criterion:9

Students who met CELDT criterion:17.0%
State:30.0%
Listening Mean Scale Score:477.5
California:482.8
Reading Mean Relation Score:467.5
State:482.4
Speaking Mean Scale Score:462.8
California:483.2
Writing Insubstantial Scale Score:481.7
California:496.8
Grade 4:
Student Count:34
Number describe students who met CELDT criterion:17

Students who met CELDT criterion:50.0%
State:35.0%
Listening Median Scale Score:541.1
California:511.2
Reading Mean Scale Score:524.5
State:506.4
Speaking Mean Scale Score:513.0
State:501.3
Writing Mean Cost Score:528.2
California:514.3
Grade 5:
Student Count:38
Number of session who met CELDT criterion:18

Students who met CELDT criterion:47.0%
State:48.0%
Listening Mean Excellent Score:527.1
State:537.3
Reading Mean Scale Score:529.3
California:528.1
Speaking Proffer Scale Score:511.4
California:517.0
Writing Mean Scale Score:527.2
California:531.8
Grade 6:
Student Count:43
Number of students who met CELDT criterion:21

Students who trip over CELDT criterion:49.0%
State:39.0%
Listening Mean Scale Score:548.0
State:538.5
Reading Mean Scale Score:536.5
State:525.5
Speaking Mean Fine Score:505.7
California:530.0
Writing Mean Scale Score:532.5
State:530.3
All Grades:
Student Count:361
Number of students who trip over CELDT criterion:95

Students who met CELDT criterion:26.0%
State:35.0%
Grade 1:
Student Count:56
Number of course group who met CELDT criterion:12

Students who met CELDT criterion:21.0%
California:35.0%
Listening Mean Ratio Score:392.6
California:428.7
Reading Mean Scale Score:376.3
California:391.1
Speaking Wild Scale Score:412.8
California:434.3
Writing Mean Scale Score:395.6
California:405.5
Grade 2:
Student Count:56
Number of students who met CELDT criterion:11

Students who tumble CELDT criterion:20.0%
California:25.0%
Listening Mean Scale Score:478.8
State:478.6
Reading Mean Scale Score:438.7
California:442.5
Speaking Mean Select Score:483.6
State:478.1
Writing Mean Scale Score:458.9
California:465.8
Grade 3:
Student Count:40
Number of students who tumble CELDT criterion:6

Students who met CELDT criterion:15.0%
State:32.0%
Listening Mean Scale Score:449.4
State:493.6
Reading Intend Scale Score:482.1
California:482.5
Speaking Mean Scale Score:465.8
State:486.4
Writing Mean Scale Score:487.9
California:494.3
Grade 4:
Student Count:45
Number of students who met CELDT criterion:19

Students who met CELDT criterion:42.0%
California:39.0%
Listening Mean Scale Score:514.7
California:522.7
Reading Mean Exemplar Score:514.6
California:510.8
Speaking Mean Scale Score:500.3
California:505.9
Writing Contemplate Scale Score:518.2
California:512.8
Grade 5:
Student Count:44
Number inducing students who met CELDT criterion:23

Students who met CELDT criterion:52.0%
State:50.0%
Listening Intend Scale Score:526.6
California:544.3
Reading Mean Scale Score:541.0
State:531.9
Speaking Mean Scale Score:510.9
California:519.3
Writing Mean Superior Score:524.6
State:527.0
Grade 6:
Student Count:47
Number of caste who met CELDT criterion:24

Students who met CELDT criterion:51.0%
California:44.0%
Listening Mean Fine Score:556.0
State:551.6
Reading Mean Scale Score:561.8
State:532.4
Speaking Compromise Scale Score:540.4
California:532.5
Writing Mean Scale Score:548.3
State:534.7
All Grades:
Student Count:321
Number of students who met CELDT criterion:84

Students who reduction CELDT criterion:26.0%
California:31.0%
Kindergarten:
Student Count:47
Number of grade who met CELDT criterion:1

Students who met CELDT criterion:2.0%
California:8.0%
Listening Mean Percentage Score:298.0
State:348.7
Reading Mean Scale Score:291.1
California:294.0
Speaking Inconsiderate Scale Score:296.9
State:345.3
Writing Mean Scale Score:334.3
State:337.4
Grade 1:
Student Count:60
Number of students who met CELDT criterion:18

Students who fall down CELDT criterion:30.0%
California:32.0%
Listening Mean Scale Score:421.2
State:423.8
Reading Mean Scale Score:400.4
California:389.5
Speaking Mean Degree Score:440.9
California:431.8
Writing Mean Scale Score:408.7
State:402.3
Grade 2:
Student Count:46
Number of students who tumble CELDT criterion:9

Students who met CELDT criterion:20.0%
State:24.0%
Listening Mean Scale Score:460.8
California:466.1
Reading Plot Scale Score:452.6
California:440.6
Speaking Mean Scale Score:492.2
California:484.0
Writing Mean Scale Score:453.9
California:452.2
Grade 3:
Student Count:49
Number of students who met CELDT criterion:8

Students who met CELDT criterion:16.0%
California:25.0%
Listening Mean Scale Score:481.3
State:468.8
Reading Mean Compass Score:458.8
California:471.7
Speaking Mean Scale Score:476.1
State:486.4
Writing Stark Scale Score:477.8
State:484.8
Grade 4:
Student Count:36
Number vacation students who met CELDT criterion:12

Students who met CELDT criterion:33.0%
State:33.0%
Listening Compromise Scale Score:504.6
State:504.0
Reading Mean Scale Score:485.7
State:503.1
Speaking Mean Scale Score:474.1
State:505.0
Writing Mean Fine Score:501.4
State:506.6
Grade 5:
Student Count:45
Number of division who met CELDT criterion:18

Students who met CELDT criterion:40.0%
State:44.0%
Listening Mean Percentage Score:527.3
California:528.2
Reading Mean Scale Score:518.6
State:526.9
Speaking Mode Scale Score:517.6
State:517.8
Writing Mean Scale Score:540.8
California:524.0
Grade 6:
Student Count:38
Number of students who met CELDT criterion:18

Students who reduction CELDT criterion:47.0%
California:40.0%
Listening Mean Scale Score:546.0
California:546.8
Reading Mean Scale Score:544.9
California:529.0
Speaking Mean Point of reference Score:508.6
California:533.3
Writing Mean Scale Score:511.7
California:525.3